James madison federalist 10 essay

The friend of popular governments never finds himself so much alarmed for their character and fate, as when he contemplates their propensity to this dangerous vice.

The author Cato another pseudonym, most likely that of George Clinton [24] summarized the Anti-Federalist position in the article Cato no. Let me add that it is the great desideratum by which this form of government can be rescued from the opprobrium under which it has so long labored, and be recommended to the James madison federalist 10 essay and adoption of mankind.

The Anti-Federalists Brutus and Cato both quoted Montesquieu on the issue of the ideal size of a republic, citing his statement in The Spirit of the Laws that: This list credited Hamilton with a full sixty-three of the essays three of those being jointly written with Madisonalmost three-quarters of the whole, and was used as the basis for an printing that was the first to make specific attribution for the essays.

The second expedient is as impracticable, as the first would be unwise. In the next place, as each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens in the large than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried; and the suffrages of the people being more free, will be more likely to centre in men who possess the most attractive merit and the most diffusive and established characters.

A republic, Madison writes, is different from a democracy because its government is placed in the hands of delegates, and, as a result of this, it can be extended over a larger area.

A religious sect may degenerate into a political faction in a part of the Confederacy; but the variety of sects dispersed over the entire face of it must secure the national councils against any danger from that source.

For instance, United States Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens cites the paper for the statement, "Parties ranked high on the list of evils that the Constitution was designed to check".

Rather than adopting the repressive 'cure' for faction that the majority today endorses, the Framers armed individual citizens with a remedy".

There could be "a rage for paper money, for an abolition of debts, for an equal division of property, or for any other improper or wicked project," Madison warns Dawsonp.

This volume, titled The Federalist, was released on March 2, Evidently by one of two only. The republican form of government works to prevent factions because a higher number of representatives guard against the attempts of the few, and because the extended sphere of the republic makes it less probably that a faction will become a majority of the whole.

Beard identified Federalist No. Brutus points out that the Greek and Roman states were small, whereas the U. He notes that if constituencies are too large, the representatives will be "too little acquainted with all their local circumstances and lesser interests".

Hence, the number of representatives in the two cases not being in proportion to that of the two constituents, and being proportionally greater in the small republic, it follows that, if the proportion of fit characters be not less in the large than in the small republic, the former will present a greater option, and consequently a greater probability of a fit choice.

Anti- Federalist paper: Brutus andFederalist no 10: James Madison - Essay Example

Does the advantage consist in the substitution of representatives whose enlightened views and virtuous sentiments render them superior to local prejudices and schemes of injustice? It was first printed in the Daily Advertiser under the name adopted by the Federalist writers, "Publius"; in this it was remarkable among the essays of Publius, as almost all of them first appeared in one of two other papers: The effect of the first difference is, on the one hand, to refine and enlarge the public views, by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country, and whose patriotism and love of justice, will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations.

For this reason, and because Hamilton and Madison were each important members of the Constitutional Convention, The Federalist Papers are often used today as a means to interpret the intentions of those drafting the Constitution. The federal Constitution forms a happy combination in this respect; the great and aggregate interests being referred to the national, the local and particular to the State legislatures.

Federalist No. 10

He makes an argument on how this is not possible in a pure democracy but possible in a republic. From the protection of different and unequal faculties of acquiring property, the possession of different degrees and kinds of property immediately results: The Federalist begins and ends with this issue.

Nor, in many cases, can such an adjustment be made at all, without taking into view indirect and remote considerations, which will rarely prevail over the immediate interest which one party may find in disregarding the rights of another, or the good of the whole. On the other hand, the effect may be inverted.

On the other hand, the effect may be inverted. Davidowitz to the validity of ex post facto laws in the decision Calder v. Madison offers two ways to check majority factions: A landed interest, a manufacturing interest, a mercantile interest, a moneyed interest, with many lesser interests, grow up of necessity in civilized nations, and divide them into different classes, actuated by different sentiments and views.

It also provides for a federal navy that will assist the United States in establishing commercial privileges in this hemisphere. Though Madison argued for a large and diverse republic, the writers of the Federalist Papers recognized the need for a balance.Using James Madison’s essays, Federalist No.

10 and Federalist No. 51, Americans can have a better understanding of how logic was and is used in our government. James Madison was the fourth president of the United States and is one of the founding fathers of the United States. Federalist Papers and Paper 10 The Federalist Papers are a series of editorials that three of the framers of the constitution whom are: James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote in in support of the ratification of the constitution.

Madison Federalist 10&nbspEssay

These three and the rest of the framers made clear they favored a republican form of government. Analysis of Federalist Paper No. 10 by James Madison specifically for you. One of the most controversial papers is Essay No.

10, written by James Madison. In this paper Madison discusses the nature, functions and effects of fractions and the way government can control them. James Madison 's Federalist # 10 A Faction Essay - According to James Madison’s Federalist #10 a faction was a group of citizens, either large or small, who came together and act on common grounds for the rights of other people and/or their community.

The Federalist Papers Number 10 is written by James Madison and explains the necessity of the Constitution to protect our country from factions. A faction is “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion or of interest, adverse to the rights of.

madison To the People of the State of New York: AMONG the numerous advantages promised by a wellconstructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction.

Download
James madison federalist 10 essay
Rated 4/5 based on 78 review