The juvenile court has such an aspect as adjudication, which is also known as a finding hearing. Urban criminals face stiffer penalty.
The cost of juveniles in the adult court that is already at a 24 month trial a waiting period for adults will then increase this waiting period because of the increase juvenile amounts that have been thrown into the adult court system. To Spank or Not to Spank This 6-page paper discusses the controversy over spanking as a means of disciplining children, and argues that the practice should be abolished.
American Journal Of Criminal Law, 37 2 The argument includes factual information about the incompetence of court appointed attorneys. Three reasons for abolishing the process are then discussed.
I do not agree with this at all. A trial is the same issue in the adult court. Even though the term juvenile justice system is gone, all of the adult rights and more are now granted to the juvenile.
Feld has a good idea behind his youth discounts, however I do not believe judges would follow these rules. Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. Defenders also contend that many of the alleged defects of the juvenile courts can be traced to inadequate funding and to the environment in which many juveniles are forced to live.
Argument To Abolish The Electoral College This 8 page paper presents an argument to abolish the electoral college process. The juvenile detention facility would need to offer incentives to teachers that are willing to help educated many of these troubled teens.
At present time, there is a problem of the societal implications of abolishing juvenile court. To make sure this educational program will work, part of what I am proposing is that the court must require these individuals to participate.
An 18 page paper which examines whether or not juvenile offenders should be tried as adults. One of the most important systems that needs to be retained is the educational system.
It is difficult to pick one side, and therefore I propose a hybrid version. To make sure this educational program will work, part of what I am proposing is that the court must require these individuals to participate.
However, the article does note that the level of education that is delivered to juveniles while incarcerated is nationally recognized as being far from as effective as it should be.
The most important aim of the juvenile court is rehabilitation of the individuals, their treatment.
The juvenile court has such an aspect as adjudication, which is also known as a finding hearing. Even though the term juvenile justice system is gone, all of the adult rights and more are now granted to the juvenile.
Supreme court case of In Re Gault, the court said that juveniles accused of crimes must be afforded many of the same rights that adults get.
The point of this research focuses mainly on helpful punishment or utilitarian theory, which is the best way to deal with these youths. Serving a few years in a juvenile correction facility for a crime that if committed by an adult would result in a ten-year sentence is unjust.
Youth In Adult Court A 5 page paper. As I have stated multiple times above, our concept of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate the offender and get the child ready to be brought back into society again. Because of these deficiencies, critics contend, the system should be dismantled.
To award trial by jury, Miranda warnings, and the right to counsel only to adults does not represent a fair and balanced justice system. Applying all three of these criteria we will be able to see why the combination of them will result in the best outcome.
Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Just one year later, in the case of Stanford v. If a juvenile is not granted these rights, there is no way he can expect a fair trial. Presentation of Position B: Juvenile Law - Further Readings [next] [back] Juvenile Law - Modern Juvenile Law Citing this material Please include a link to this page if you have found this material useful for research or writing a related article.Comparative Analysis of Juvenile Court and Adult Court.
An 8 page comparison which provides an overview of the juvenile justice system, a point by point comparison between juvenile and adult courts, benefits and disadvantages of juvenile court from the perspective of a youthful offender, societal implications of abolishing juvenile court.
The Societal Implications of Abolishing Juvenile Court. Nowadays, the juvenile crime is one of the crucial problems of each society. The first juvenile court was established in Chicago near one hundred years ago. Nov 08, · Barry Feld, a law professor from the U of M and an expert on the juvenile justice system, says the juvenile justice system needs to be abolished.
He claims that “within the past three decades, judicial decisions, legislative amendments, and administrative changes have transformed the juvenile court from a nominally rehabilitative social welfare agency into a scaled-down, second-class criminal.
The juvenile justice system seeks to rehabilitate children, rather than punish them for their juvenile criminal behavior. Since the late s, critics of the juvenile courts have sought to abolish this system, arguing that it has failed in its rehabilitation efforts and in not.
Societal Implications of Abolishing Juvenile Court The juvenile justice system plays a vital role in the outcome of juvenile delinquents lives.
If juvenile courts are abolished, juvenile offenders will be forced into adult prisons and harsher sentences may be given to young juveniles. An 8 page comparison which provides an overview of the juvenile justice system, a point by point comparison between juvenile and adult courts, benefits and disadvantages of juvenile court from the perspective of a youthful offender, societal implications of abolishing juvenile court, and recommendations for the future of the juvenile justice system.Download